Skip to main content

DE-CLASSIFIED: A look into Netaji's death mystery


NETAJI SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE

 

Netaji Bose was an eminent leader and a man of action. His praises are endless. Bose was a man great visionary, a revolutionary, and a charismatic orator. He wasn’t afraid of using stringent methods to achieve justice. From a very young age, Bose began to serve his motherland and with time, grew into an influential personality. Some glimpses at his personality are as follows:


Subhas Chandra Bose

1.     1.An Inspiration

When the country shuddered with the fear of raising weapons against British powers, it was this man that said built his own army and shouted with the fire in his belly,”It is blood alone that can pay the price of freedom…Give me blood, and I shall give you freedom.” Bose believed,”Freedom is not given. It is taken” For his valour and determination, he was praised by people of all age and gender. For his incomparable leadership, he was called “Netaji” by his admirers.

2.     2.A humble human

Bose was the heir to rich parents. He gave up his wealth and comfort and dedicated his life to fighting for Indian independence. Also, he was highly educated. He ranked fourth when there were six vacancies for the Indian Civil Service Examination. He idolized Swami Vivekanada as a young kid and took insytances from Bhagvat Gita during his protest against the British.

3.     3. A reformer

Bose had great reverence for Gandhi. He presided over two sessions of the Indian National Congress. It was in 1938, that Bose expressed his concern for complete Home Rule (Purna Swaraj) and the use of force against the British that created a rift in the INC. Thereafter, he resigned and formed the Forward Bloc. Later, he raised the Indian National Army which led the country to the doors of independence.

 

4.     4. Believed in the power of women

Bose believed in the power of women. He formed the Rani of Jhansi regiment which was an all-women regiment. He was one of the first leaders that handed weapons in the hands of women. He also made a proposition that rapes would much least be tolerated and rapists should be punished with death sentence, without any trial.

 

5.     5. A great diplomat

Throughout the struggle, Subhas Bose visited many parts of the world. He had plans to seek help from the Soviet Union and the Communist party of China. He had friendly links with Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler, who were infamous in India for their aggressive mentality.  This was one bold act of that period.




Contributions to the freedom struggle

 

·           In the early days of working with Gandhi, Bose served to enlighten students and labourers in Bengal.

·           He started the newspaper 'Swaraj'.

·           In 1924, Bose became the CEO of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation.  

·           In 1927, he was elected the President of the All India Youth Congress and the Secretary of the Bengal State Congress.

·           In 1930, he became the Mayor of Calcutta.

·       He addressed two sessions of the INC, but resigned after a conflict between his methodology and Gandhiji’s.

·       He formed the All-India Forward Bloc in 1939 to spread his ideas of independence throughout.

·       He revived Rash Behari Bose’s Indian National Army (Azad Hind Fauj) in 1942

·       He travelled to countries to seek alliance to fight against the British force.

·       With the help of the Japanese army, INA re-captured the Andaman and Nicobar Islands from the British.


Bose with Capt. Lakshmi Sahgal of the Rani of Jhansi

Bose arriving at one of the INC sessions 
Bose with the INA


 Bose with Gandhi




The Death Theories:

 

1.    
1.Netaji died in a plane crash in Taiwan

 

On 23 August 1945, Japanese news agency Domei announced the death of INA leader Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose in a plane crash in Taikhoku (present-day Taipei, Japan).

Apropos of the report, Japanese Army General Shidea and Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose had lost their lives in the plane crash.

Bose’s body was reportedly cremated in Taikhoku.

Japanese news headlines reporting the death of Bose and General Shidea

This news came as disbelief to INA personnel and the INC. Mahatma Gandhi was dubious of the plane crash but later accepted the claims. The INA did not collapse after the death of Netaji. It rather fulfilled its motive.

 

This is the official theory that is accepted by the Government of India.

 

Faults in the theory:

·       The Government supports this theory on the basis of only circumstantial evidence (eye-witnesses and claims).

Letters received by Suresh Chandra Bose from Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru

·       No post-mortem report was produced, nor were any photographs or even a death certificate of Netaji’s dead body was published after the plane crash.

·       The Japanese Government has no report of such a plane crash on that date in August.

·       If it was true that the Japanese Army General Shidea had died in that same plane crash, then there should have been grand ceremonial funeral rites, but that never happened.

1.    

2.2.Netaji did not die in a plane crash, he was killed in Siberia

 

This theory was initially put forth by BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy, which claims that Bose did not die in a plane crash. After fleeing house arrest, Bose flew to Russia, where he took asylum. The leader claims that Bose was killed there under the orders of Russian dictator Joseph Stalin. Indian Army Officer G D Bakshi went on to the extent of saying that he was held captive in a Siberian prison and tortured and that Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru knew about it.


Bose/ Joseph Stalin

No investigation has been done on this theory.

Faults in the theory:

 

·        There is evidence that Bose stayed in USSR for a while, but no concrete proof that his death was a planned homicide.

Moreover, Bose had friendly relations with Stalin.

·        Claims that Nehru, in connection with Stalin, planned this murder cannot hold true as both of them were known to averse each other.

 

1.     3.Bose lived on for years after his death in disguise

 

Many historians believe this one theory that caught the public eye when, reportedly, a sadhu died in Faizabad in 1985. Eye-witnesses claimed that it was Netaji Bose.


                                                                         The Hindu renunciant - Bhagwanji

 When an investigation was done on the life of the Hindu renunciant (named Bhagwanji), pieces of the puzzle started fitting in, and all the doubts and speculations were met with answers. Media played a large role in bringing the matter to limelight, but the whole story got contained in its origin. Although many myths evolved after that, the Government did not entertain any questions regarding the connection between the Hindu renunciant and the INA leader.

 

The Gumnami Baba Theory


Bose/Gumnami baba

In 2014, when Narendra Modi took up the PMO office, hundreds of files were de-classified that held documents, letters, and official papers relating to the death of Bose. Numerous historians have been working on the mystery ever since.

 

In the midst of de-classifying these files, the Government de-classified some peculiar files that gave rise to the spurge of questions. Some of these files showed that Bose’s family was being spied on for nearly two decades after his death. Historians questioned this action asking why a dead person’s family is being spied on. And, if Government believed that the person is not dead, then why was he kept hidden from the country all the while?

 

From what was found from digging into the life of Gumnami baba, there are pieces of evidence that he had tried to establish a connection with the world by writing secret letters to political leaders. Also, this sadhu never made any public appearances but knew about the functionality of the Government. Gumnami baba was found to have many places which were from Nepal to Lucknow, Neemsar, Ayodhya, Basti, and lastly Faziabad (formerly Ayodhya) where he died. These places were the same as those which accounted for the spotting of Netaji.

 

There ran another lore in North Bengal about a Shaulmari baba, who, the members of “Subhasbadi Janata” (an organization formed by people who believed that Bose was alive) affirmed to be Subhas Chandra Bose. But this lore is also short-lived.

 

Prolific historian and author Anuj Dhar setup a far-fetched investigation into the Gumnami baba theory. He sent  Gumnami baba’s  handwritten notes and Netaji’s letters to  a forensic lab, where they were tested by expert Carl Baggett, who claimed that they were written by the same person.

                                                                            
     Columns from The Times of India on the handwriting test


Inquiry Commissions that investigated the death of

 Subhash Chandra Bose

 

From 1946 to 2005, there were four cumulative committees/commissions/report(s) that investigated the death of Bose. These were as follows:

1.     The Figgess Report (1946)

The report was submitted by Colonel Figgess in 1946. The report took into account eye-witnesses and statements of the plane crash survivors and came down to the following conclusions:

i.                 Bose died of a heart attack and multiple third-degree burns after a plane crash in Taihoku

ii.                Bose died in military hospital

iii.               He was creamted in Taihoku and his ashes were sent to Tokyo

One critical statement written in the report read:

The possibility of a pre-arranged fabrication must be excluded since most of the individuals concerned had no opportunity of contact with one another prior to interrogation.

2.     The Shah Nawaz Committee (1956)

This was a three-member committee including former Lt. Colonel Shah Nawaz Khan of the INA, ICS S N Maitra, and Bose’s elder brother Suresh Chandra Bose. Much like the Figgess Report, this committee enquired 67 witnesses of the plane crash including Dr. Yoshimi, the surgeon who treated Bose and Habib ur Rahman, who was on the flight.

When it was time to sign the report, Suresh Bose refrained saying his other two staffs were clouding crucial evidence relating to the death of his brother, under the orders of Nehru, who wanted to establish the make-believe that Netaji died in the crash.

3.     The Khosla Commission (1970)

The commission was led single-handedly by retd. Punjab High Court Chief Justice G D Khosla. This commission could not come up with additional evidence and only explained the reports of sightings of Bose at different places.

4.     The Mukherjee Commission (2005)

Led by retd. Supreme Court Judge Manoj Kumar Mukherjee, this Commission started off with the belief that evidence found from the plane crash cannot solely justify Netaji’s death. It built its reports after taking sight of reports from the countries visited by Netaji before he died. Mukherjee believed that the plane crash could have only been a cover-up to deceive the public and safely pave Bose his escape to USSR.

The commission found that the ashes kept in Renkoji Temple, Japan were not that of Bose, but of a Japanese soldier. Also, a DNA test conducted by the Commission contended that Gumnami baba and Netaji were not the same person

The findings of the commission were turned down by the Government.


If Gumnami baba was Netaji, why didn’t he reveal himself or the Government expose him?

If Gumnami baba was Netaji, this was his reasons for leaving undercover:

·       Gumnami baba reasoned that disclosing his true identity was not a wise decision and was not in favour of the public.

 

·       During World War II, Netaji had friendly relations with Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini as such. Being in contact with the Axis powers had merited him the title of a War Criminal. Had Bose, by any fortune, returned to India, he’d have been declared as the Prime Minister of the nation. But a war criminal cannot be entitled to govern a country. Back then, the only attitude towards a war criminal was declaring him a death sentence. Therefore, revealing himself would only be a risk to his life.

 

·       Although INA was the only force that led the freedom struggle after the Quit India Movement failed, INA was not appraised as deserved. Rather, the victory over British rule was credited to Gandhiji, and INA was eclipsed. That amounted to 80% of people cheering for Gandhiji and just 20% of people vouching for Bose. Bose had a deep respect for Gandhi but had resigned from the INC, following a clash in the method of retaliation against British forces. This seeded a discordance between the followers of Gandhi and the followers of Bose. Had Bose come to a public platform, he’d have faced more rivalry than support.

 

·       Throughout the globe, the hero of the Indian Freedom struggle is known to be Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. India’s freedom struggle is popular for being “non-aggressive, non-violent and peaceful”, which is not wholly true. The “Gandhian principles” are a big pillar that hold the supreme image of the country on international platforms.   Unmasking the aggressive side of the freedom struggle would bring questions to image that is built. Therefore, Government is accused of suppressing pivotal proofs that justify Bose’s existence after his acclaimed death.

 

·       In accordance with Gumnami baba, the nation wasn’t truly independent. It still was under the reigns of British forces. For example, the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy were under the control of British Empire until 1955 and 1958 respectively. He was discontent with what people called “freedom” even when the Head of the State back then was not Indian (King George V).

 

·       Netaji coming to public spotlight would have given rise to a large whirlwind in the political system of the state. Therefore, the Government does not take up actions when new evidences surface.

 

*Important Note*

All the sentences written as “perspectives” of Netaji as Gumnami baba are plainly conclusions drawn by historians, and not officially recorded statements.




No one ever knew where Bose lived after 1945. To many, he was a War Criminal. To the rest, he was a War Hero. People are still wondering why Government is denying proofs related to the death mystery of the hero. The legacy of Bose re-lived after the declassification of all these files. Despite all of this, Netaji became a forgotten hero…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you




Bibliography:

·        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Subhas_Chandra_Bose#:~:text=Indian%20nationalist%20leader%20Subhas%20Chandra,now%20Taipei)%2C%20Japanese%20Taiwan.

·        https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/joseph-stalin-was-instrumental-in-killing-netaji-subramanian-swamy/articleshow/66010899.cms?from=mdr

·        https://www.firstpost.com/india/why-subhas-chandra-boses-death-is-indias-biggest-cover-up-375766.html


See also:

  • India's Biggest Cover-up: Book by Anuj Dhar










Contributed by:
Akansha Singh and Bhakti Sudha Nayak

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Happiness... In the depths of our soul, a flame ignites, A dance of happiness, pure and bright. With pride as our shield, we stand tall, Excitement dances, ignite our soul, As passions flourish, creativity unfold. Value your worth, breaking down every wall. For within us lies a unique power, A small packet of joy whose aura fragnences every hour. Have to celebrate ourselves, with love so deep, Music of happiness, our soul shall keep. With down to earth attitude and longing for something, should make ourselves high. Yes, Happiness and self-acceptance, forever nearby. -Sauvik Prasad

12 Angry Men (Analysis of Underlying Themes)

Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men tells the story of a jury of 12 men in charge of deciding the fate of a poor, young boy who had killed his father. The film opens in a courtroom with the defence and the prosecution presenting their evidence before the judge. After the oral pleadings, the jurors are instructed by the judge to retreat and determine the verdict. The judge also says that the jurors must return a 'not guilty' verdict if they find any reasonable doubt. From the beginning of the film, we can see that the jury room is split into two opposing sides: 'guilty' and 'not guilty'. Juror 8 and Juror 3 are the most significant characters as they are the only ones who vote not guilty and guilty respectively at the beginning of the film, thereby initiating the conflict. In a way, Juror 8 represents the boy's innocence while Juror 3 represents the boy's guilt. Although Juror 3 says that he is merely stating the facts of the case, which undoubtedly point to